Political Beliefs, Views about Technocracy, and Energy and Climate Policy Preferences
Publisher’s VersionCode (GitHub)
Cite
@article{nowlin2021political,
title = {Political Beliefs, Views about Technocracy, and Energy and Climate Policy Preferences},
author = {Matthew C. Nowlin},
year = {2021},
journal = {Public Understanding of Science, 30(3): 331–348},
doi = {10.1177/0963662520978567},
url = {https://matthewcnowlin.com/publication/political-beliefs-technocracy-energy-climate/}
}
Abstract
The use of technocratic decision-making, where policy decisions are made by elite experts, is an important aspect of policymaking in the United States. However, little work has examined public opinion about technocracy. Using data from a representative sample of the United States (n = 1200), I explore differences in support for technocracy and the implications of that support for views about politically controversial energy sources and climate policies. Overall, I find that liberal Democrats, moderate/conservative Democrats, and moderate/liberal Republicans were more likely than conservative Republicans and moderate independents to support technocratic decision-making. In addition, I find that as support for technocracy increases, so does support for energy sources and climate policies; however, there are significant interaction effects across political beliefs.
See Also
- [Paper] Climate Science or Politics? Disentangling the Roles of Citizen Beliefs and Support for Energy in the United States (2022)
- [Paper] What Beliefs Are Central in the Climate Change Belief System Network? (2026)
- [Presentation] Institutions and Actors in US Climate Policy (2024)
- [Presentation] Beliefs about Climate Change (2023)
- [Presentation] Climate Change: Science, Policy, and Politics (2019)
- [Presentation] The Policy and Politics of Climate Change (2017)
- [Paper] Cultural Theory, Political Ideology, and Burden Tolerance: The Role of Core Beliefs in Shaping Support for Administrative Burdens (2026)
- [Paper] Policy Beliefs, Belief Uncertainty, and Policy Learning Through the Lens of the Advocacy Coalition Framework (2024)